Chinese Journal OF Rice Science ›› 2017, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1): 81-90.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2017.6036
• Orginal Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Jianfeng HU1, Bo YANG2, Wei ZHOU1, Peipei ZHANG1, Qiang ZHANG1, Peicheng LI1, Wanjun REN1,*(), Wenyu YANG1
Received:
2016-03-04
Revised:
2016-07-27
Online:
2017-01-20
Published:
2017-01-10
Contact:
Wanjun REN
胡剑锋1, 杨波2, 周伟1, 张培培1, 张强1, 李培程1, 任万军1,*(), 杨文钰1
通讯作者:
任万军
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Jianfeng HU, Bo YANG, Wei ZHOU, Peipei ZHANG, Qiang ZHANG, Peicheng LI, Wanjun REN, Wenyu YANG. Effect of Seeding Method and Density on the Benefit of Mechanical Transplanting in indica Hybrid Rice[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2017, 31(1): 81-90.
胡剑锋, 杨波, 周伟, 张培培, 张强, 李培程, 任万军, 杨文钰. 播种方式和播种密度对杂交籼稻机插秧节本增效的研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(1): 81-90.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.ricesci.cn/EN/10.16819/j.1001-7216.2017.6036
每工作行程插秧 机秧爪取秧次数 N1 | 每回合秧爪取秧宽度 d1 /cm | 条插行数 N2 | 秧苗行距 d2 /cm | 导种槽宽度 d3 /cm | 粒长 L/cm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
18 | 1.56 | 18 | 1.56 | 0.78-1.56 | 0.57-0.64 |
20 | 1.40 | 20 | 1.40 | 0.70-1.40 | |
26 | 1.20 | 26 | 1.08 | 0.54-1.08 | |
24 | 1.10 | 24 | 1.17 | 0.58-1.17 |
Table1 Parameters for drill planters and rice transplanters.
每工作行程插秧 机秧爪取秧次数 N1 | 每回合秧爪取秧宽度 d1 /cm | 条插行数 N2 | 秧苗行距 d2 /cm | 导种槽宽度 d3 /cm | 粒长 L/cm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
18 | 1.56 | 18 | 1.56 | 0.78-1.56 | 0.57-0.64 |
20 | 1.40 | 20 | 1.40 | 0.70-1.40 | |
26 | 1.20 | 26 | 1.08 | 0.54-1.08 | |
24 | 1.10 | 24 | 1.17 | 0.58-1.17 |
粒型与播种密度 Seed shape and seeding density /(g·plate-1) | 机条播A2 | 机散播 A1 | 人工撒播 A3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
18行 18 lines | 20行 20 lines | 24行 24 lines | 26行 26 lines | 平均 Average | |||
长粒型(长/宽>2.7)Long-grain type(Length/Width>2.7) | |||||||
50 | 85.98 bB | 88.04 bB | 96.60 aA | 86.81 bB | 89.36 aA | 77.07 bB | 72.27 cB |
75 | 88.07 bB | 89.81 bAB | 94.17 aA | 87.95 bB | 90.00 aA | 84.14 bB | 78.88 cB |
100 | 86.35 bA | 86.04 bA | 90.81 aA | 88.00 abA | 87.80 aA | 87.52 aA | 87.29 aA |
平均 Average | 86.80 bB | 87.96 bB | 93.86 aA | 87.58 bB | 89.05 aA | 82.91 bAB | 79.48 cB |
圆粒型(长/宽<2.2) Cirdllar grain type(Length/Width<2.2) | |||||||
50 | 87.17 bcB | 90.51 bAB | 94.55 aA | 85.51 cB | 89.43 aA | 79.58 bB | 74.49 cB |
75 | 94.28 aA | 94.97 aA | 96.27 aA | 93.82 aA | 94.83 aA | 92.01 aA | 83.27 bB |
100 | 92.99 aA | 93.84 aA | 96.27 aA | 93.82 aA | 94.23 aA | 93.27 aA | 92.03 aA |
平均 Average | 91.48 bA | 93.11 abA | 95.69 aA | 91.05 bA | 92.83 aA | 88.29 bAB | 83.26 cB |
Table 2 Seeding uniformity under different seeding methods.%
粒型与播种密度 Seed shape and seeding density /(g·plate-1) | 机条播A2 | 机散播 A1 | 人工撒播 A3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
18行 18 lines | 20行 20 lines | 24行 24 lines | 26行 26 lines | 平均 Average | |||
长粒型(长/宽>2.7)Long-grain type(Length/Width>2.7) | |||||||
50 | 85.98 bB | 88.04 bB | 96.60 aA | 86.81 bB | 89.36 aA | 77.07 bB | 72.27 cB |
75 | 88.07 bB | 89.81 bAB | 94.17 aA | 87.95 bB | 90.00 aA | 84.14 bB | 78.88 cB |
100 | 86.35 bA | 86.04 bA | 90.81 aA | 88.00 abA | 87.80 aA | 87.52 aA | 87.29 aA |
平均 Average | 86.80 bB | 87.96 bB | 93.86 aA | 87.58 bB | 89.05 aA | 82.91 bAB | 79.48 cB |
圆粒型(长/宽<2.2) Cirdllar grain type(Length/Width<2.2) | |||||||
50 | 87.17 bcB | 90.51 bAB | 94.55 aA | 85.51 cB | 89.43 aA | 79.58 bB | 74.49 cB |
75 | 94.28 aA | 94.97 aA | 96.27 aA | 93.82 aA | 94.83 aA | 92.01 aA | 83.27 bB |
100 | 92.99 aA | 93.84 aA | 96.27 aA | 93.82 aA | 94.23 aA | 93.27 aA | 92.03 aA |
平均 Average | 91.48 bA | 93.11 abA | 95.69 aA | 91.05 bA | 92.83 aA | 88.29 bAB | 83.26 cB |
Fig. 2. Dynamic characteristics of tiller number under different seeding methods and planting densities. A1,Mechanized broadcasting; A2,Mechanized drilling seeding; B1,Seeding level of 40 g/plate; B2, 50 g/plate; B3, 60 g/plate; B4, 70 g/plate. The same as in tables and figures below.
处理 Treatment | 秧苗充实度 Dry weight per unit seedling height /(mg·cm-1) | 成苗率 Rate of seedlings /% | 盘结力 Root twisting degree /(kg·dm-2) | 发根力 Root- developing ability /cm | 百株苗 干质量 Dry weight per 100 seedlings/g | 百株根 干质量 Dry root weight per 100 plants/g | 根冠比 Root- shoot rate | N积累量 N accumulation /(mg·plant-1) | 分蘖芽发生率 Percentage of tiller occurrence /% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 3.01 aA | 68.67 a | 1.86 b | 84.13 aA | 5.72 aA | 0.809 a | 0.14 | 2.41 aA | 70.38 aA |
A1B2 | 2.83 aA | 68.42 a | 2.05 ab | 61.79 bB | 5.65 aA | 0.814 a | 0.14 | 2.37 aA | 36.38 bB |
A1B3 | 2.55 aAB | 64.46 b | 2.27 a | 56.32 cC | 4.26 bAB | 0.669 ab | 0.16 | 1.76 bAB | 26.44 bcBC |
A1B4 | 2.13 bB | 64.36 b | 2.20 a | 55.88 cC | 3.93 bB | 0.542 b | 0.14 | 1.56 bB | 18.12 cC |
A2B1 | 3.55 a | 74.67 aA | 1.85 bB | 87.48 aA | 7.15 aA | 0.975 a | 0.14 | 3.65 aA | 72.44 aA |
A2B2 | 2.96 b | 69.60 bAB | 2.45 aA | 69.15 bB | 5.94 abAB | 0.754 ab | 0.13 | 2.87 bA | 37.59 bB |
A2B3 | 2.61 b | 67.37 bB | 2.75 aA | 58.55 cC | 5.17 bB | 0.578 b | 0.11 | 1.99 cB | 37.59 bB |
A2B4 | 2.97 ab | 61.12 cC | 2.40 aA | 44.32 dD | 5.39 bB | 0.619 b | 0.12 | 1.97 cB | 29.29 bB |
F值 F value | |||||||||
播种方式 Method(A) | 4.37 | 29.82* | 10.92 | 0.04 | 25.32* | 0.10 | 5.42 | 25.68* | 2.82 |
播种密度 Density(B) | 6.77** | 14.83** | 8.34** | 89.42** | 6.90** | 3.40 | 0.11 | 16.84** | 30.92** |
A×B | 0.38 | 4.21* | 1.34 | 6.38** | 0.70 | 0.58 | 0.77 | 2.29 | 0.64 |
Table 3 Effects of seeding methods and planting densities on seedling quality.
处理 Treatment | 秧苗充实度 Dry weight per unit seedling height /(mg·cm-1) | 成苗率 Rate of seedlings /% | 盘结力 Root twisting degree /(kg·dm-2) | 发根力 Root- developing ability /cm | 百株苗 干质量 Dry weight per 100 seedlings/g | 百株根 干质量 Dry root weight per 100 plants/g | 根冠比 Root- shoot rate | N积累量 N accumulation /(mg·plant-1) | 分蘖芽发生率 Percentage of tiller occurrence /% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 3.01 aA | 68.67 a | 1.86 b | 84.13 aA | 5.72 aA | 0.809 a | 0.14 | 2.41 aA | 70.38 aA |
A1B2 | 2.83 aA | 68.42 a | 2.05 ab | 61.79 bB | 5.65 aA | 0.814 a | 0.14 | 2.37 aA | 36.38 bB |
A1B3 | 2.55 aAB | 64.46 b | 2.27 a | 56.32 cC | 4.26 bAB | 0.669 ab | 0.16 | 1.76 bAB | 26.44 bcBC |
A1B4 | 2.13 bB | 64.36 b | 2.20 a | 55.88 cC | 3.93 bB | 0.542 b | 0.14 | 1.56 bB | 18.12 cC |
A2B1 | 3.55 a | 74.67 aA | 1.85 bB | 87.48 aA | 7.15 aA | 0.975 a | 0.14 | 3.65 aA | 72.44 aA |
A2B2 | 2.96 b | 69.60 bAB | 2.45 aA | 69.15 bB | 5.94 abAB | 0.754 ab | 0.13 | 2.87 bA | 37.59 bB |
A2B3 | 2.61 b | 67.37 bB | 2.75 aA | 58.55 cC | 5.17 bB | 0.578 b | 0.11 | 1.99 cB | 37.59 bB |
A2B4 | 2.97 ab | 61.12 cC | 2.40 aA | 44.32 dD | 5.39 bB | 0.619 b | 0.12 | 1.97 cB | 29.29 bB |
F值 F value | |||||||||
播种方式 Method(A) | 4.37 | 29.82* | 10.92 | 0.04 | 25.32* | 0.10 | 5.42 | 25.68* | 2.82 |
播种密度 Density(B) | 6.77** | 14.83** | 8.34** | 89.42** | 6.90** | 3.40 | 0.11 | 16.84** | 30.92** |
A×B | 0.38 | 4.21* | 1.34 | 6.38** | 0.70 | 0.58 | 0.77 | 2.29 | 0.64 |
处理 Treatment | 漏插率 Rate of empty hills /% | 每穴苗数 Seeding number per hill | 单株带蘖数 Tiller number per plant | 基本苗 Basic seedling number /(×104/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 17.68 aA | 1.37 bB | 0.53 aA | 35.25 a |
A1B2 | 16.09 aAB | 1.43 bAB | 0.23 bB | 29.69 b |
A1B3 | 13.69 bB | 1.57 aA | 0.14 bcBC | 32.21 ab |
A1B4 | 5.54 cC | 1.63 aA | 0.06 cC | 32.81 ab |
A2B1 | 17.07 aA | 1.40 cB | 0.55 aA | 36.04 |
A2B2 | 13.98 bAB | 1.53 bAB | 0.24 bB | 33.15 |
A2B3 | 11.69 bBC | 1.57 abAB | 0.24 bB | 34.03 |
A2B4 | 9.46 cC | 1.70 aA | 0.17 bB | 36.23 |
F值 F value | ||||
播种方式 Method(A) | 1.44 | 4.00 | 2.92 | 8.93 |
播种密度 Density(B) | 49.53** | 9.46** | 33.58** | 2.89 |
A×B | 6.95** | 0.83 | 0.64 | 0.32 |
Table 4 Effects of seeding methods and planting densities on mechanical transplanting quantity.
处理 Treatment | 漏插率 Rate of empty hills /% | 每穴苗数 Seeding number per hill | 单株带蘖数 Tiller number per plant | 基本苗 Basic seedling number /(×104/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 17.68 aA | 1.37 bB | 0.53 aA | 35.25 a |
A1B2 | 16.09 aAB | 1.43 bAB | 0.23 bB | 29.69 b |
A1B3 | 13.69 bB | 1.57 aA | 0.14 bcBC | 32.21 ab |
A1B4 | 5.54 cC | 1.63 aA | 0.06 cC | 32.81 ab |
A2B1 | 17.07 aA | 1.40 cB | 0.55 aA | 36.04 |
A2B2 | 13.98 bAB | 1.53 bAB | 0.24 bB | 33.15 |
A2B3 | 11.69 bBC | 1.57 abAB | 0.24 bB | 34.03 |
A2B4 | 9.46 cC | 1.70 aA | 0.17 bB | 36.23 |
F值 F value | ||||
播种方式 Method(A) | 1.44 | 4.00 | 2.92 | 8.93 |
播种密度 Density(B) | 49.53** | 9.46** | 33.58** | 2.89 |
A×B | 6.95** | 0.83 | 0.64 | 0.32 |
处理 Treatment | 产量 Grain yield /(kg·hm-2) | 有效穗 Effective panicle number /(×104·hm2) | 成穗率 Percentage of fertile tillers/% | 每穗实粒数 Filled grain number | 结实率 Seed-setting rate/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | 充实率 Filled grain percentage /% | 充实度 Grain plumpness /% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 8546.53 ab | 215.30 | 68.26 | 130.1 | 93.4 | 32.8 | 96.00 | 95.75 |
A1B2 | 8603.84 ab | 217.94 | 62.44 | 136.4 | 90.9 | 32.3 | 97.32 | 96.64 |
A1B3 | 9084.45 a | 247.38 | 68.48 | 128.6 | 93.1 | 32.5 | 96.43 | 96.62 |
A1B4 | 8320.51 b | 256.62 | 67.53 | 118.2 | 91.4 | 32.7 | 96.25 | 94.90 |
A2B1 | 8405.79 b | 207.33 | 64.99 | 134.2 | 92.1 | 32.6 a | 97.12 | 97.30 |
A2B2 | 9081.18 a | 227.60 | 64.84 | 125.9 | 92.0 | 32.1 ab | 95.38 | 95.50 |
A2B3 | 9015.49 a | 241.42 | 63.44 | 124.9 | 92.4 | 32.4 a | 96.08 | 96.99 |
A2B4 | 8862.06 ab | 245.83 | 63.58 | 120.8 | 90.6 | 31.7 b | 94.83 | 95.36 |
F值 F value | ||||||||
播种方式 Method(A) | 0.59 | 0.36 | 0.40 | 0.87 | 2.46 | 1.22 | 2.89 | 0.06 |
播种密度 Density(B) | 2.71 | 2.02 | 0.39 | 1.08 | 1.37 | 1.20 | 0.79 | 1.37 |
A×B | 1.30 | 0.12 | 0.65 | 0.37 | 0.49 | 2.15 | 0.83 | 0.59 |
Table 5 Effects of seeding methods and planting densities on grain yield and its components of mechanically-transplanted rice.
处理 Treatment | 产量 Grain yield /(kg·hm-2) | 有效穗 Effective panicle number /(×104·hm2) | 成穗率 Percentage of fertile tillers/% | 每穗实粒数 Filled grain number | 结实率 Seed-setting rate/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | 充实率 Filled grain percentage /% | 充实度 Grain plumpness /% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 8546.53 ab | 215.30 | 68.26 | 130.1 | 93.4 | 32.8 | 96.00 | 95.75 |
A1B2 | 8603.84 ab | 217.94 | 62.44 | 136.4 | 90.9 | 32.3 | 97.32 | 96.64 |
A1B3 | 9084.45 a | 247.38 | 68.48 | 128.6 | 93.1 | 32.5 | 96.43 | 96.62 |
A1B4 | 8320.51 b | 256.62 | 67.53 | 118.2 | 91.4 | 32.7 | 96.25 | 94.90 |
A2B1 | 8405.79 b | 207.33 | 64.99 | 134.2 | 92.1 | 32.6 a | 97.12 | 97.30 |
A2B2 | 9081.18 a | 227.60 | 64.84 | 125.9 | 92.0 | 32.1 ab | 95.38 | 95.50 |
A2B3 | 9015.49 a | 241.42 | 63.44 | 124.9 | 92.4 | 32.4 a | 96.08 | 96.99 |
A2B4 | 8862.06 ab | 245.83 | 63.58 | 120.8 | 90.6 | 31.7 b | 94.83 | 95.36 |
F值 F value | ||||||||
播种方式 Method(A) | 0.59 | 0.36 | 0.40 | 0.87 | 2.46 | 1.22 | 2.89 | 0.06 |
播种密度 Density(B) | 2.71 | 2.02 | 0.39 | 1.08 | 1.37 | 1.20 | 0.79 | 1.37 |
A×B | 1.30 | 0.12 | 0.65 | 0.37 | 0.49 | 2.15 | 0.83 | 0.59 |
处理 Treatment | 育秧人工 Labor for seedling culture(No./hm2) | 用种量 Seeding rate /(kg·hm-2) | 种子成本 Seed cost /(Yuan·hm-2) | 农资及其他 Agricultural production materials and others /(Yuan·hm-2) | 投入成本 Input cost /(Yuan·hm-2) | 产量 Grain yield /(kg·hm-2) | 总收益 Total income /(Yuan·hm-2) | 产投比 Output/ input |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 7.5 | 15.00 | 600 | 4687.5 | 5888 | 8546.53 | 17 093.06 | 2.903 |
A1B2 | 7.5 | 18.75 | 750 | 4687.5 | 6038 | 8603.84 | 17 207.68 | 2.850 |
A1B3 | 7.5 | 22.50 | 900 | 4687.5 | 6188 | 9084.45 | 18 168.90 | 2.936 |
A1B4 | 7.5 | 26.25 | 1050 | 4687.5 | 6338 | 8320.51 | 16 641.02 | 2.626 |
A2B1 | 7.5 | 15.00 | 600 | 4687.5 | 5888 | 8405.79 | 16 811.58 | 2.855 |
A2B2 | 7.5 | 18.75 | 750 | 4687.5 | 6038 | 9081.18 | 18 162.36 | 3.008 |
A2B3 | 7.5 | 22.50 | 900 | 4687.5 | 6188 | 9015.49 | 18 030.98 | 2.914 |
A2B4 | 7.5 | 26.25 | 1050 | 4687.5 | 6338 | 8862.06 | 17 724.12 | 2.796 |
平均值 Average | ||||||||
A1 | 7.5 | 20.63 | 825 | 4687.5 | 6113 | 8638.83 | 17 277.66 | 2.826 |
A2 | 7.5 | 20.63 | 825 | 4687.5 | 6113 | 8841.16 | 17 682.32 | 2.893 |
B1 | 7.5 | 15.00 | 600 | 4687.5 | 5888 | 8476.17 | 16 952.34 | 2.879 |
B2 | 7.5 | 18.75 | 750 | 4687.5 | 6038 | 8842.51 | 17 685.02 | 2.929 |
B3 | 7.5 | 22.50 | 900 | 4687.5 | 6188 | 9049.98 | 18 099.96 | 2.925 |
B4 | 7.5 | 26.25 | 1050 | 4687.5 | 6338 | 8591.28 | 17 182.56 | 2.711 |
Table 6 Economic benefit of different seeding methods and planting densities.
处理 Treatment | 育秧人工 Labor for seedling culture(No./hm2) | 用种量 Seeding rate /(kg·hm-2) | 种子成本 Seed cost /(Yuan·hm-2) | 农资及其他 Agricultural production materials and others /(Yuan·hm-2) | 投入成本 Input cost /(Yuan·hm-2) | 产量 Grain yield /(kg·hm-2) | 总收益 Total income /(Yuan·hm-2) | 产投比 Output/ input |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 7.5 | 15.00 | 600 | 4687.5 | 5888 | 8546.53 | 17 093.06 | 2.903 |
A1B2 | 7.5 | 18.75 | 750 | 4687.5 | 6038 | 8603.84 | 17 207.68 | 2.850 |
A1B3 | 7.5 | 22.50 | 900 | 4687.5 | 6188 | 9084.45 | 18 168.90 | 2.936 |
A1B4 | 7.5 | 26.25 | 1050 | 4687.5 | 6338 | 8320.51 | 16 641.02 | 2.626 |
A2B1 | 7.5 | 15.00 | 600 | 4687.5 | 5888 | 8405.79 | 16 811.58 | 2.855 |
A2B2 | 7.5 | 18.75 | 750 | 4687.5 | 6038 | 9081.18 | 18 162.36 | 3.008 |
A2B3 | 7.5 | 22.50 | 900 | 4687.5 | 6188 | 9015.49 | 18 030.98 | 2.914 |
A2B4 | 7.5 | 26.25 | 1050 | 4687.5 | 6338 | 8862.06 | 17 724.12 | 2.796 |
平均值 Average | ||||||||
A1 | 7.5 | 20.63 | 825 | 4687.5 | 6113 | 8638.83 | 17 277.66 | 2.826 |
A2 | 7.5 | 20.63 | 825 | 4687.5 | 6113 | 8841.16 | 17 682.32 | 2.893 |
B1 | 7.5 | 15.00 | 600 | 4687.5 | 5888 | 8476.17 | 16 952.34 | 2.879 |
B2 | 7.5 | 18.75 | 750 | 4687.5 | 6038 | 8842.51 | 17 685.02 | 2.929 |
B3 | 7.5 | 22.50 | 900 | 4687.5 | 6188 | 9049.98 | 18 099.96 | 2.925 |
B4 | 7.5 | 26.25 | 1050 | 4687.5 | 6338 | 8591.28 | 17 182.56 | 2.711 |
[1] | 牛盾. 我国农业机械化的新形势和水稻生产机械化问题. 农业工程学报, 2000, 16(4): 7-10. |
Niu D.New situation of agricultural mechanization and the development of paddy production mechanization in China.Trans CSAE, 2000, 16(4): 7-10. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 宋建农, 庄乃生, 王立臣, 刘小伟, 魏文军. 21世纪我国水稻种植机械化发展方向. 中国农业大学学报, 2000, 5(2): 30-33. |
Song J N, Zhuang N S, Wang L C, Liu X W, Wei W J.The development tendency of Chinese rice planting mechanization in the 21st Century.J China Agric Univ, 2000, 5(2): 30-33. | |
[3] | 陈惠哲, 向镜, 徐一成, 林贤青, 张玉屏, 朱德峰. 水稻免耕机插质量、生长特性及产量的形成. 中国水稻科学, 2013, 27(6): 610-616. |
Chen H Z, Xiang J, Xu Y C,Lin X Q, Zhang Y P, Zhu D F.Effect of no-tillage on the quality of mechanical transplanting, growth and grain yield of rice.Chin J Rice Sci, 2013, 27(6): 610-616.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 臧英, 罗锡文. 周志艳. 南方水稻种植和收获机械化的发展策略. 农业机械学报, 2008, 39(1): 60-63. |
Zang Y, Luo X W, Zhou Z Y.Development strategy on rice planting and harvesting mechanization in south China.Transac CSAM, 2008, 39(1): 60-63.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 吴崇友, 金诚谦, 卢晏, 涂安富. 我国水稻种植机械发展问题探讨. 农业工程学报, 2000, 16(2): 21-23. |
Wu C Y, Jin C Q, L Y,Tu A F. Discussion of developing rice planting machine in China.Trans CSAE, 2000, 16(2): 21-23.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 罗汉亚, 李吉, 袁钊和, 何瑞银, 马拯胞, 张璐. 杂交稻机插秧育秧播种密度与取样面积耦合关系. 农业工程学报, 2009, 25(7): 98-102. |
Luo H Y, Li J, Yuan Z H,He R Y, Ma Z B, Zhang L.Coupling relationships of nursing seedling densities and finger sticking area by mechanized hybrid rice transplanter.Transac CSAE, 2009, 25(7): 98-102.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 何文洪, 陈惠哲, 朱德峰, 徐一成, 林贤青, 张玉屏. 不同播种量对水稻机插秧苗素质及产量的影响.中国稻米, 2008(3) : 60-62. |
He W H, Chen H Z, Zhu D F, Xu Y C, Lin X Q, Zhang Y P.Effects of different sowing densities on seedling quality and yield of rice of mechanical transplanting.China Rice, 2008(3): 60-62.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | Hiroyuki S, Hisashi K, Kensuke O, Kazuyasu N, Mitsunori S, Akio O, Morio M, Satoko Y.Development of rice "seed-mats"consisting of hardened seeds with a cover of soil for the rice transplantor.Plant Prod Sci, 2008, 11(1): 108-115 |
[9] | 李耀明, 徐立章, 向忠平, 邓玲黎. 日本水稻种植机械化技术的最新研究进展. 农业工程学报, 2005, 21(11): 182-185. |
Li Y M, Xu L Z, Xiang Z P, Deng L L.Research advances of rice planting mechanization in Japan.Trans CSAE, 2005, 21(11): 182-185.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 金庆明. 突破水稻机插瓶颈的难点及对策讨.中国农机化, 2009(4): 28-30. |
Jin Q M.Difficulties in the breakthrough of the bottlenecks for rice transplanting by machine and their resolving strategies.China Agric Mechan, 2009(4): 28-30.(in Chinese) | |
[11] | 姚雄, 杨文钰, 任万军. 育秧方式和播种量对水稻机插长秧龄秧苗的影响. 农业工程学报, 2009, 25(6): 152-157. |
Yao X, Yang W Y, Ren W J.Effects seedling raising methods and sowing rates on machine-transplanted long-age rice seedling.Transac CSAE , 2009, 25(6): 152-157.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 彭长青, 李世峰, 卞新民, 吴九林, 周宇, 刘蓉蓉. 机插水稻高产栽培关键技术的适宜值. 应用生态学报, 2006, 17(9): 1619-1623. |
Peng C Q, Li S F, Bian X M, Wu J L, Zhou Y, Liu R R.Appropriate parameters for high-yielding cultivation of machine-transplanted rice.Chin J Appl Ecol, 2006, 17(9) : 1619-1623. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 李世峰, 刘蓉蓉, 吴九林. 不同播量与移栽密度对机插水稻产量形成的影响. 作物杂志, 2008, 17: 71-74. |
Li S F, Liu R R, Wu J L.Effects of different sowing rates and transplanting densities on yield formation of machine-transplanted rice.Crops, 2008, 17: 71-74.(in Chinese) | |
[14] | 艾治勇, 马国辉, 青先国. 超级杂交稻生理生态特征及高产稳产栽培调控的研究进展. 中国水稻科学, 2011, 25(5) : 553-560. |
Ai Z Y, Ma G H, Qin X G.Physiological and ecological characteristics and cultivation regulation for high and stable yield of super hybrid rice.Chin J Rice Sci, 2011, 25(5): 553-560.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 徐一成, 朱德峰, 赵匀, 陈惠哲. 超级稻精量条播与撒播育秧对秧苗素质及机插效果的影响. 农业工程学报, 2009, 25(1) : 99-103. |
Xu Y C, Zhu D F, Zhao Y, Chen H Z.Effects of broadcast sowing and precision drilling of super rice seed on seedling quality and effectiveness of mechanized transplanting.Trans CSAE, 2009, 25(1): 99-103. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 沈建辉, 邵文娟, 张祖建, 景启坚, 杨建昌, 陈文林, 朱庆森. 苗床落谷密度、施肥量和秧龄对机插稻苗质及大田产量的影响. 作物学报, 2006, 32(3): 402-409. |
Shen J H, Shao W J, Zhang Z J, Jin Q J, Yang J C, Chen W L, Zhu Q S.Effects of sowing density, fertilizer amount in seedbed and seedling age on seedling quality and grain yield in paddy field for mechanical transplanting rice.Acta Agron Sin,2006, 32(3): 402-409. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 李刚华, 于林惠, 候朋福, 王绍华, 刘正辉, 王强盛, 凌启鸿, 丁艳锋. 机插水稻适宜基本苗定量参数的获取与验证. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28(8): 98-104. |
Li G H, Yu L H, Hou P F, Wang S H, Liu Z H, Wang Q S, Ling Q H, Ding Y F.Calculation and verification of quantitative parameters of optimal planting density of machine-transplant rice.Trans CSAE, 2012, 28(8): 98-104. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 李杰, 张洪程, 龚金龙, 常勇, 吴桂成, 郭振华, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕. 稻麦两熟地不同栽培方式超级稻分蘖特性及其与群体生产力的关系. 作物学报, 2011, 37(2): 309-320. |
Li J, Zhang H C, Gong J L, Chang Y, Wu G C, Guo Z H, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y.Tillering characteristics and its relationships with population productivity of super rice under different cultivation methods in rice-wheat cropping areas.Acta Agron Sin, 2011, 37(2): 309-320.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 沈建辉, 邵文娟, 张祖建, 杨建昌, 曹卫星, 朱庆森. 水稻机插中苗双膜育秧落谷密度对苗质和产量影响的研究. 作物学报, 2004, 30(9): 906-911. |
Shen J H, Shao W J, Zhang Z J, Yang J C, Cao W X, Zhu Q S.Effects of sowing density on quality of medium-seedling nursed with two-layer plastic film and grain yield in mechanical transplanting rice.Acta Agron Sin, 2004, 30(9): 906-911. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 张卫星, 朱德峰, 林贤青, 徐一成, 林兴军, 陈惠哲, 张玉屏. 不同播量及育秧基质对机插水稻秧苗素质的影响. 扬州大学学报:农业与生命科学版, 2007, 28(1): 45-48. |
Zhang W X, Zhu D F, Lin X Q, Xu Y C, Lin X J, Chen H Z, Zhang Y P.The effects of different sowing densities and raising materials on seedling quality of mechanical transplanting rice.J Yangzhou Univ:Agric Life Sci Ed. 2007, 28(1): 45-48. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 李泽华, 马旭, 谢俊峰, 陈国锐, 郑志雄, 谭永炘, 黄益强. 双季稻区杂交稻机插秧低播量精密育秧试验. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(6): 17-27. |
Li Z H,Ma X, Xie J F, Chen G R, Zheng Z X, Tan Y X, Hang Y Q.Experiment on precision seedling raising and mechanized transplanting of hybrid rice under low sowing rate in double cropping area.Trans CSAE , 2014, 30(6): 17-27. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 于林惠, 丁艳锋, 薛艳风, 凌启鸿, 袁钊和. 水稻机插秧田间育秧秧苗素质影响因素研究. 农业工程学报, 2006, 22(3): 73-78. |
Yu L H, Ding Y F, Xue Y F, Ling Q H, Yuan Z H.Factors effecting rice seedling quality of mechanical transplanting rice.Trans CSAE, 2006, 22(3): 73-78. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 马均, 孙永健, 苟永成, 李学根, 罗甫全. 杂交稻钵形毯状育秧机插不同播种密度与秧龄研究. 中国稻米, 2011, 17(3):11-14. |
Ma J, Sun Y J, Gou Y C, Li X G, Luo P Q.Study on sowing density and seedling age of hybrid rice in machinery bowl-shaped blanket seedling.China Rice, 2011, 17(3):11-14.(in Chinese) | |
[24] | 宋云生, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 朱聪聪, 孙圳, 杨大柳, 王惟清, 刘俊, 吴爱国. 水稻钵苗机插秧苗素质的调控. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(22): 11-22. |
Song Y S, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Zhu C C, Sun Z, Yang D L, Wang W Q, Lui J, Wu A G.Seedling quality regulation of rice potted-seedling in mechanical transplanting.Trans CSAE, 2013, 29(22): 11-22.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | HUANG Yaru, XU Peng, WANG Lele, HE Yizhe, WANG Hui, KE Jian, HE Haibing, WU Liquan, YOU Cuicui. Effects of Exogenous Trehalose on Grain Filling Characteristics and Yield Formation of japonica Rice Cultivar W1844 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 379-391. |
[2] | DONG Liqiang, YANG Tiexin, LI Rui, SHANG Wenqi, MA Liang, LI Yuedong, SUI Guomin. Effect of Plant-row Spacing on Rice Yield and Root Morphological and Physiological Characteristics in Super High Yield Field [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 392-404. |
[3] | WANG Wenting, MA Jiaying, LI Guangyan, FU Weimeng, LI Hubo, LIN Jie, CHEN Tingting, FENG Baohua, TAO Longxing, FU Guanfu, QIN Yebo. Effect of Different Fertilizer Application Rates on Rice Yield and Quality Formation and Its Relationship with Energy Metabolism at High Temperature [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 253-264. |
[4] | YANG Xiaolong, WANG Biao, WANG Benfu, ZHANG Zhisheng, ZHANG Zuolin, YANG Lantian, CHENG Jianping, LI Yang. Effects of Different Water Management on Yield and Rice Quality of Dry-seeded Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 285-294. |
[5] | WEI Xiaodong, SONG Xuemei, ZHAO Ling, ZHAO Qingyong, CHEN Tao, LU Kai, ZHU Zhen, HUANG Shengdong, WANG Cailin, ZHANG Yadong. Effects of Silicon and Zinc Fertilizer and Their Application Ways on Yield and Grain Quality of Rice Variety Nanjing 46 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 295-306. |
[6] | LIN Dan, JIANG Min, MIAO Bo, GUO Meng, SHI Chunlin. Research on Simulation Model of High Temperature Stress on Rice and Its Application in Fujian Province [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 307-320. |
[7] | PEI Feng, WANG Guangda, GAO Peng, FENG Zhiming, HU Keming, CHEN Zongxiang, CHEN Hongqi, CUI Ao, ZUO Shimin. Evaluation of New japonica Rice Lines with Low Cadmium Accumulation and Good Quality Generated by Knocking Out OsNramp5 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(1): 16-28. |
[8] | ZHANG Lu, LIANG Qingduo, WU Longlong, HUANG Jing, TIAN Cang, ZHANG Junhua, CAO Xiaochuang, ZHU Chunquan, KONG Yali, JIN Qianyu, ZHU Lianfeng. Effects of Nitrogen-reducing and Oxygen-increasing Irrigation on Rice Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(1): 78-88. |
[9] | WANG Yingheng, CHEN Lijuan, CUI Lili, ZHAN Shengwei, SONG Yu, CHEN Shian, XIE Zhenxing, JIANG Zhaowei, WU Fangxi, ZHUO Chuanying, CAI Qiuhua, XIE Huaan, ZHANG Jianfu. Effects of Nitrogen Rate on Photosynthesis, Yield and Grain Quality of Superior Quality Rice “Fuxiangzhan” [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(1): 89-101. |
[10] | REN Weichen, CHANG Qingxia, ZHANG Yajun, ZHU Kuanyu, WANG Zhiqin, YANG Jianchang. Characteristics and Physiological Mechanism of Carbon and Nitrogen Accumulation and Translocation of japonica Rice Varieties Differing in Nitrogen Use Efficiency [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2022, 36(6): 586-600. |
[11] | WEI Xiaodong, ZHANG Yadong, SONG Xuemei, CHEN Tao, ZHU Zhen, ZHAO Qinyong, ZHAO Ling, LU Kai, LIANG Wenhua, HE Lei, HUANG Shengdong, XIE Yinfeng, WANG Cailin. Photosynthetic and Physiological Characteristics of High Yield japonica Rice Variety Nanjingjinggu [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2022, 36(6): 611-622. |
[12] | ZENG Bo, GONG Junyi, ZHANG Fang. Analysis and Prospects of Extension of Main Varieties of Hybrid Rice with High Quality in China [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2022, 36(5): 439-446. |
[13] | WANG Minyu, DAI Zhigang, YU Defang, WANG Xiangping, GUAN Shaohua, SHAO Yuangang, ZHANG Jiaxue, LI Xiaokun. Effects of Simplified Application of Dedicated Fertilizer on Yield, Fertilizer Use Efficiency and Economic Benefit in Rice-ratoon Rice System [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2022, 36(5): 531-542. |
[14] | ZENG Wenjing, QIU Lanying, CHEN Junjie, QIAN Haoyu, ZHANG Nan, DING Yanfeng, JIANG Yu. Effect of Elevated CO2 Concentration on Rice Growth and CH4 Emission from Paddy Fields Under Straw Incorporation [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2022, 36(5): 543-550. |
[15] | ZHANG Yujie, WANG Zhiqiang, MA Peng, YANG Zhiyuan, SUN Yongjian, MA Jun. Effects of Water-nitrogen Coupling on Nitrogen Uptake, Utilization and Yield of Rice Under Wheat Straw Returning [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2022, 36(4): 388-398. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||